Observation
- The selection of only 6 of the 25 project managers could be classified as formal or involving lengthy consideration (i.e., energy was spent identifying needed skills, reviewing candidates, and selecting an individual)
I asked my respondents to comment on the attributes that were important when selecting a PM for a large IT project. The following attributes were identified as selection criteria for project managers for the sample projects:
- Communications skills – 6 responses
- Business knowledge – 5 responses
- PM came highly recommended – 5
- Reputation for delivery – 5
- Sound judgment – 4
- Person was simply available – 4
- Organizational skills – 3
- Strong relationship with business community – 3
- Technical knowledge -2
- Negotiating skills – 2
- Demonstrated leadership with business community – 2
- Maturity level of person – 1
- Similar work in the past – 1
- PM was on the project’s steering committee – 1
Please note, some PMs were selected based on a few criteria. The number of responses does not equal the number of projects in the sample.
What do you think about the list of selection criteria? I was shocked at “Person was simply available.” This is an honest response, but weak. I have worked on many projects where “technical knowledge” of the project manager was considered critical. However, technical knowledge of the PM came into play for only two of the twenty-five projects.
By technical do you men PM tecniques or IT?
ReplyDelete